Freud (Routledge Philosophers)


Manufacturer: Routledge
Availability: Usually ships in 6 to 12 days

List Price:$100.00
Our Price:$84.50
buy


Authors:
  • Jonathan Lear

Description:



Freud (Routledge Philosophers)
Reviews:

starsExemplary Introduction to Freud's Thought
This smallish book is not for those who have already spent a considerable amount of time with Freud, and it doesn't attempt to be. The project undertaken here by Lear differs significantly from Ricoeur's Hermeneutic or LaPlanche's extensive dictionary. Those looking for a comprehensive history of psychoanalysis, a mitigation of Freud and Lacan, of Freud and Wittgenstein, or similarly advanced readings of Freud should look elsewhere. That said, for those attempting to gain access to the breadth of Freud's work, even and especially those with the intention of eventually arriving at an advanced appropriation of Freud's work, this introduction is better than anything else available. It is telling that we find Richard Rorty, Slavoj Zizek and Sebastian Gardner corroborating on the back cover that there really is no philosophical introduction to Freudian psychoanalysis more worthwhile.


starsDisappointed by Jonathan Lear
This book about Freud by Lear is totally disappointing. I bought it because I found Lear's other book both sensitive and thoughtful. But in this book Lear reduces Freud to a very ordinary psychologist, who is mainstream and mostly commonsense. In this way he completely misrepresnts Ferud's originality, his daring hypotheses and the fact that much of what Freud said is highly questionable, partly on purely methodolgocal grounds. According to Lear, to mention one example, Freud's chief significance consists in he fact that he "discovered" (?) that sexual libido can be directed towards a fetish, rather than towards a person of the oposite sex (sic!).Lear takes no notice of the highly critical literature about Freud, nor does he refer to attempts to reinterprete Freud in terms of, say, Wiitgenstein's philosophy of our understanding of language. Readers might like to look at chapters 5 and 6 of my book of 1999, entitled "Critique of Impure Reason. An Essay on Neurons, Somatic Markers and Consciousness", published by Praeger.These chapters will make them realise how supeficial and misleading Jonathan Lear's book about Freud is.


starsA WONDERFUL AND IMPORTANT BOOK
As soon as I heard that Jonathan Lear letter "Freud" was for the Routledge philosopher row, pre ordered I a copy. I am sad the fact that he is taken to communicate me thus long, a report had formed, but I the book since him arrived again-read savoring, parts and notes. . as I did with most Lears preceding victims, that examined inestimable in my own philosophy psychology study project, which goes back at least 15 years. The point behind books Lears, if I can be regarding so fat, a governing idea, are that and I estimate, "generally, in the English-speaking world, it an unfortunate tendency gave, thus philosophers and Psychoanalytiker select ignore themselves." And Lear explains, why they should not. If I paraphrasieren can: Psychology without philosophy is personally recompencing and favourably however in the range limited; Philosophy without psychology can illuminate however personally non transformative, which is to say that the "large" philosopher cannot be wretch its considerable knowledge anything does to promote internal harmony or extend personal liberty; indeed entire study project cannot be anything by a psychological deviation to be! Lear continues saying: "philosophers take seriously such terms such as autonomy, authenticity, liberty and luck in their accounts of the human life and its possibilities. But it is difficult to see like these terms to be sufficiently addressed be able to consider without "accounts of, imagine like individual psychology developed and all influences we and. On the other hand psychologists bend "to be ignorant by that whole work are settled from the philosophers on the nature of the luck and the liberty." Lear aims off to heal the "intellectual splitting that up, has, to lead to depletion on both sides." Lear pushes wonderfully its project by slogan of quoting Socrates ', "knows Thyself," as starting point for the two camps back draws back together, not the fact that he believes that it is probable that everyone can really know each other in each possible all way but, because he believes understanding is the genesis of the even fundamentally, which without her the philosopher confounds knowledge for intelligence and forgets ignorance and complexity. If you remember, Socrates admits (some say disingenuously), for its ignorance far also proclaims, which begins with the delimitations on knowing. It humbled in reality in view of its personal complexities in the ways that most philosophers are not, and this takes out, I believes, a crucial difference between knowledge and intelligence. Philosophy means, "love of intelligence." But it seems more over knowledge and truth to have become. That is, it is not for the philosopher, like the pious fundamentalist to think it has somewhat absolute knowledge over the world rarely and fat requirements over those "facts to form." Therefore intelligence forms no such requirements and comes more naeeher at a way of life than a body of the knowledge. That the philosophy, which is begun out with intelligence and Obacht of the even wonderfully illustrated of Pierre Hadot in its, "philosophy as way of life." I could also write to sides on Hadots wonderful book, (there I over Lear could), but a stating line of Epicurus do: "we must with let us welfare-end our own lives us to concern." Then we can try, over the world however with less probability of receiving to learn waylaid by our hidden agendas. I think that Epicurus sums project Lears, which is to be shown, that we err, if we split psychology and philosophy up. To the book return to the hand: It goes, without saying that Lear writes shining over Freud. The chapter on Transference -- and complete idea of the Transferencewelt, in which all will get caught we -- is the price of the admission alone. "Freud" by Jonathan Lear in high of degrees for views of the first Psychoanalytiker and for welfare-end the column between two important disciplines recommended!



More Products:


--end of Freud (Routledge Philosophers)