Manufacturer: Routledge Availability: Usually ships in 6 to 12 days
List Price:$100.00 Our Price:$84.50
Authors:
Jonathan Lear
Description:
Reviews:
Exemplary Introduction to Freud's Thought This smallish book is not for those who have already spent a considerable amount of time with Freud, and it doesn't attempt to be. The project undertaken here by Lear differs significantly from Ricoeur's Hermeneutic or LaPlanche's extensive dictionary. Those looking for a comprehensive history of psychoanalysis, a mitigation of Freud and Lacan, of Freud and Wittgenstein, or similarly advanced readings of Freud should look elsewhere. That said, for those attempting to gain access to the breadth of Freud's work, even and especially those with the intention of eventually arriving at an advanced appropriation of Freud's work, this introduction is better than anything else available. It is telling that we find Richard Rorty, Slavoj Zizek and Sebastian Gardner corroborating on the back cover that there really is no philosophical introduction to Freudian psychoanalysis more worthwhile.
Disappointed by Jonathan Lear This book about Freud by Lear is totally disappointing. I bought it because I found Lear's other book both sensitive and thoughtful. But in this book Lear reduces Freud to a very ordinary psychologist, who is mainstream and mostly commonsense. In this way he completely misrepresnts Ferud's originality, his daring hypotheses and the fact that much of what Freud said is highly questionable, partly on purely methodolgocal grounds. According to Lear, to mention one example, Freud's chief significance consists in he fact that he "discovered" (?) that sexual libido can be directed towards a fetish, rather than towards a person of the oposite sex (sic!).Lear takes no notice of the highly critical literature about Freud, nor does he refer to attempts to reinterprete Freud in terms of, say, Wiitgenstein's philosophy of our understanding of language. Readers might like to look at chapters 5 and 6 of my book of 1999, entitled "Critique of Impure Reason. An Essay on Neurons, Somatic Markers and Consciousness", published by Praeger.These chapters will make them realise how supeficial and misleading Jonathan Lear's book about Freud is.
A WONDERFUL AND IMPORTANT BOOK As soon as I heard that Jonathan Lear letter "Freud" was for the
Routledge philosopher row, pre ordered I a copy. I am sad the fact
that he is taken to communicate me thus long, a report had formed, but
I the book since him arrived again-read savoring, parts and notes. .
as I did with most Lears preceding victims, that examined inestimable
in my own philosophy psychology study project, which goes back at
least 15 years. The point behind books Lears, if I can be regarding so
fat, a governing idea, are that and I estimate, "generally, in the
English-speaking world, it an unfortunate tendency gave, thus
philosophers and Psychoanalytiker select ignore themselves." And Lear
explains, why they should not. If I paraphrasieren can: Psychology
without philosophy is personally recompencing and favourably however
in the range limited; Philosophy without psychology can illuminate
however personally non transformative, which is to say that the
"large" philosopher cannot be wretch its considerable knowledge
anything does to promote internal harmony or extend personal liberty;
indeed entire study project cannot be anything by a psychological
deviation to be! Lear continues saying: "philosophers take seriously
such terms such as autonomy, authenticity, liberty and luck in their
accounts of the human life and its possibilities. But it is difficult
to see like these terms to be sufficiently addressed be able to
consider without "accounts of, imagine like individual psychology
developed and all influences we and. On the other hand psychologists
bend "to be ignorant by that whole work are settled from the
philosophers on the nature of the luck and the liberty." Lear aims off
to heal the "intellectual splitting that up, has, to lead to depletion
on both sides." Lear pushes wonderfully its project by slogan of
quoting Socrates ', "knows Thyself," as starting point for the two
camps back draws back together, not the fact that he believes that it
is probable that everyone can really know each other in each possible
all way but, because he believes understanding is the genesis of the
even fundamentally, which without her the philosopher confounds
knowledge for intelligence and forgets ignorance and complexity. If
you remember, Socrates admits (some say disingenuously), for its
ignorance far also proclaims, which begins with the delimitations on
knowing. It humbled in reality in view of its personal complexities in
the ways that most philosophers are not, and this takes out, I
believes, a crucial difference between knowledge and intelligence.
Philosophy means, "love of intelligence." But it seems more over
knowledge and truth to have become. That is, it is not for the
philosopher, like the pious fundamentalist to think it has somewhat
absolute knowledge over the world rarely and fat requirements over
those "facts to form." Therefore intelligence forms no such
requirements and comes more naeeher at a way of life than a body of
the knowledge. That the philosophy, which is begun out with
intelligence and Obacht of the even wonderfully illustrated of Pierre
Hadot in its, "philosophy as way of life." I could also write to sides
on Hadots wonderful book, (there I over Lear could), but a stating
line of Epicurus do: "we must with let us welfare-end our own lives us
to concern." Then we can try, over the world however with less
probability of receiving to learn waylaid by our hidden agendas. I
think that Epicurus sums project Lears, which is to be shown, that we
err, if we split psychology and philosophy up. To the book return to
the hand: It goes, without saying that Lear writes shining over Freud.
The chapter on Transference -- and complete idea of the
Transferencewelt, in which all will get caught we -- is the price of
the admission alone. "Freud" by Jonathan Lear in high of degrees for
views of the first Psychoanalytiker and for welfare-end the column
between two important disciplines recommended!